Mapping the world's opinions

Borders are a form of global apartide

Borders preserve the priveledges of the wealthy at the expense of the poor.

openborders global apartheid equality

Context

Borders prevent the world's poorest people from accessing resources and opportunities that are available in richer countries. (1) This has led to people in poorer countries being forced to live with a lower minimum wage, greater passport restrictions, less social security and a poorer quality healthcare system than that which people in richer countries enjoy.

The Argument

There is large discrimination in the world based on place of birth/origin. This is enabling the rich to preserve their wealth and keep the poor oppressed. Immigration restrictions are similar to apartheid and Jim Crow laws, but with the criterion of discrimination being place of birth/origin rather than race (2). In this way, country borders have become a form of global apartheid.

Counter arguments

Enter the counter arguments here ...

Premises

1. Borders act to preserve the priveledges of the wealthy at the expense of the poor across the global population. 2. Preserving the priveldges of the wealthy at the expense of the poor is a form of global apartheid. 3. Borders enable a form of global apartheid.

Rejecting the premises

The premise is based on a logical fallacy. Preserving wealth does not inherently oppress the poor. This is a false dichotomy.

References

Content references here ...

Proponents

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Sunday, 7 Apr 2019 at 18:59 UTC