Mapping the world's opinions

Should surrogacy be legal? Show more Show less

Most countries have unclear legislation about surrogacy and the debate is on. Should surrogacy be legalized and under what conditions?
Commodification of human life is immoral or surrogacy is an exploitation.
<< Previous (2 of 3 Positions) Next >>

Surrogacy is women exploitation

Most women are forced into surrogacy by coercion or economic need.

(1 of 2 Arguments) Next >>


Ever since the commercial surrogacy industry kicked off in the late 1970s, it has been awash with scandals, exploitation and abuse. From the infamous “Baby M” case – in which the mother changed her mind and was forced, in tears, to hand over her baby – to the Japanese billionaire who ordered 16 children from different Thai clinics. Then there’s the case of the American surrogate mother who died; or the intended parents who refused to accept a disabled child and tried to get their surrogate to abort; not to mention the baby factories in Asia.

The Argument

Surrogacy is a form of prostitution. Most women are forced into surrogacy by coercion or economic need. Surrogacy is by definition degrading to women. It reduces them to merchandise to be bought and sold. Legalizing it would reinforce their oppression by male-dominated societies and present a clear affront to the concept of gender equality. Legalizing surrogacy would send a message to new generations that women are not commodities. Surrogacy is a Form of Alienated Labor in term of Hegel's philosophy. Surrogate mother are emotionally attached to the 'product' of their work and her work process. It's physical reproductive labor.

Counter arguments

Just another job


Enter the formal premises of the argument here ...

Rejecting the premises

Enter the technical rejections of the premises here ...


Content references here ...


Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Sunday, 13 Jan 2019 at 21:00 UTC