Ford's claims are credible. There must be an investigation before the nomination process can proceed.
Whether he did it or not is not really important. It should not affect his nomination.
Our judicial standard is that people are assumed innocent until proven guilty. This should extend to unsubstantiated claims even in a social sphere.
We shouldn't let the way he was at 17 reflect on his character now.
On Tuesday, September 18th, a spokesperson for the Judicial Crisis Network downplayed Kavanaugh’s accusations.
Carrie Severino told CNN, “[Ford] is certainly implying that it is attempted rape… I’m saying the behaviour she describes could describe a whole range of things”. She explained Kavanaugh’s behaviour could “cover a whole range of conduct, from boorishness, to rough horseplay, to actual attempted rape”.
The scenario Ford describes is attempted rape without a doubt. In her letter to Dianne Feinistein, Ford describes the incident. “Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stairwell from the living room. They [Kavanaugh and Mark Judge] locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help. Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with [Mark Judge], who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.” 
The incident Ford describes does not necessarily constitute attempted rape.
Ford is clearly describing an attempted rape. The description appears to describe an event that goes well-beyond the parameters of “rough horseplay”.
Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument