Mapping the world's opinions

<< Previous (2 of 3 Positions) Next >>

Probability of a failure is too high

A vast number of drone expeditions failed with the destruction of the spacecraft

<< Previous (3 of 3 Arguments)

Context

There have been already several failures on drone missions. A manned mission is way more complex and consequently the risks

The Argument

By considering the drone missions there have been quite a few failures which caused the destruction of the spacecraft. Even successful missions (such as Voyager) experienced some technical failures/issues which luckily still allows to accomplish most if not all mission objectives. However since failures n this case does not imply loss of human lives, the level of acceptable risks is higher. A human mission is more complex since it involves a life-maintain system that should ensure safety of the crew.Therefore the risks of a failure are higher. Also no human mission can be considered successful unless astronauta are able to successfully return to Earth; so far all drone missions have been one-way

Counter arguments

Enter the counter arguments here ...

Premises

Enter the formal premises of the argument here ...

Rejecting the premises

Enter the technical rejections of the premises here ...

References

Content references here ...

Proponents

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Sunday, 24 Feb 2019 at 14:58 UTC