Mapping the world's opinions

About us Style guide Log in  |  Sign up

Opinion map

Economics
History
The word monopolies has negative connotations in economic history, but recently monopolies have been praised by people such as Warren Buffett an Peter Thiel. The arguments for and against are not new, but some of the arguments for and against now have better empirical support.

Positions

Arguments supporting this position

Details

Context

Enter the background of the argument here ...

The Argument

Supernormal profits lead to new entrants in industries and the desire to get rich. In many industries, the first mover may enjoy the benefits of coming up with a profitable idea. The lure of profits will drive others to enter later. Without monopoly type profits, there would be little incentive to innovate. In some cases, this initial monopoly is driven by patents/copyrights. Society has chosen to reward patents for centuries in order to motivate inventors to innovate. Research and development is costly and uncertain. Monopoly profits are a just reward for innovation.

Counter arguments

Enter the counter arguments here ...

Premises

Enter the formal premises of the argument here ...

Rejecting the premises

Enter the technical rejections of the premises here ...

References

Content references here ...

Proponents

Your take

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Next step

Explore the next argument

This page was last edited on Sunday, 4 Nov 2018 at 16:56 UTC