Mapping the world's opinions

Monopolies reduce innovation

Monopologies have no need for innovation to stay ahead.

Proponents

Context

Enter the background of the argument here ...

The Argument

Many studies show that more highly concentrated industries lead to lower R&D spending as a percentage of sales. Furthermore, monopolies may spend money on R&D, but they are reticent to back new ventures, as they do not want to cannibalize their existing business or they do not want to move into new areas. For example, most of the inventions of Bell Labs were not used by AT&T but by others. Likewise, most of the inventions of Xerox's PARC laboratory were used by Apple and others, not Xerox.

Counter arguments

Enter the counter arguments here ...

Premises

Enter the formal premises of the argument here ...

Rejecting the premises

Enter the technical rejections of the premises here ...

References

Content references here ...

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore the next argument

This page was last edited on Sunday, 4 Nov 2018 at 17:07 UTC