Mapping the world's opinions

About us Style guide Log in  |  Sign up

Opinion map

There are more than 300,000,000 guns in the United States. Guns have claimed the lives of more American citizens than all the wars since the American revolution put together. With guns holding a unique place in the American psyche, should there be measures in place to limit gun ownership? What should these measures look like?


Arguments supporting this position



Bump stocks are essentially a "horizontal pogo stick" which allows users to shoot a semi-automatic weapon like an automatic weapon by bouncing the trigger off a stationary finger to replicate a rapid-fire mechanism. It allows shooters to fire many more rounds per minute.

The Argument

On October 1st, 2017, Stephen Paddock committed a mass shooting at a country music festival in Las Vegas using a bump stock mechanism. If he had not had access to a bump stock, he would not have been able to kill anywhere near as many people in the time it took for armed units to respond. Bump stocks should be banned to reduce the loss of life in mass shootings.

Counter arguments

Banning bump stocks will have almost no effect on the lethality or frequency of mass shootings in America. Firstly, they are not even that functional. They often lead to the weapon jamming or misfiring, and significantly reduce the accuracy of the weapon. In fact, not using a bump stock would probably lead to more deaths in the event of a mass shooting.[1] Secondly, if someone has decided to kill a lot of people in a mass shooting, the lack of availability of bump stocks will not change their mind. There will be just as many mass shootings, involving just as many killers, who will kill exactly the same number of victims, if not more.


[P1] Bump stocks increase the volume of rounds a weapon is capable of firing per minute. [P2] This makes them valuable to those carrying out mass shootings. [P3] They should be banned to mitigate loss of life in mass shootings.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P3] Banning bump stocks would not mitigate the loss of life in mass shooting incidents.




Your take

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Next step

Explore the next argument

This page was last edited on Friday, 18 Jan 2019 at 20:50 UTC