Mapping the world's opinions

<< Previous (3 of 5 Positions) Next >>

Western nations cannot interfere with domestic affairs of others.

There is the fine line between human rights cooperation and infringe on autonomy.

<< Previous (3 of 3 Arguments)


Enter the background of the argument here ...

The Argument

In most cases, Non-western countries perceive international human rights treaties imposed by the West as cultural colonization and a stepping on their domestic affairs, repelled by such theory and practice of human rights exhibited as an act of superiority, which alike any other colonization the western countries undertook throughout the history. Non-western countries would strike back against the West based on the point that, the West itself is acquainted with social injustices, far from being in the state of human rights violations-free. For such reason, the West must act with cautions dealing with the boundary between promoting human rights internationally and intervene on internal political issues of others.

Counter arguments

Enter the counter arguments here ...


Enter the formal premises of the argument here ...

Rejecting the premises

Enter the technical rejections of the premises here ...


Content references here ...


Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 29 Jan 2019 at 21:23 UTC